Bajaj Finance Limited
Preview the depth — unlock the full forensic study.
You're reading the free Overview. The full Landscape study, the Lenses, governance and quality scans unlock with Pro — across 5,000 Indian companies.
Briefing
Bajaj Finance Limited — the brief
Forensic posture: Serious flags. Bajaj Finance's auditors gave an unqualified opinion with only a minor note on routine loan delinquencies; related-party disclosures are largely clean except for a sharp 258% jump in loans to related parties that needs explanation, and contingent liabilities sit at a manageable 8.6% of net worth, but the earnings quality engine flags weak cash conversion—operating cash is negative while reported profits are positive.
Auditor’s report (CARO 2020)
Auditor’s assessment Minor flags. Auditor: Price Waterhouse LLP and Kirtane & Pandit LLP. Opinion: Unqualified. Fiscal year FY24-25. 0 critical, 0 material, 1 minor flag.
Related-party transactions
Assessment Notable. 12 related parties disclosed. Fiscal year FY24-25.
- Related party loan receivables surged 258% year-on-year: Loans to related parties increased sharply from ₹155 crore to ₹555.28 crore (a 258% increase), warranting review of the nature, terms, and counterparties once Note 45 (not included in this excerpt) is examined.
Contingent liabilities
Assessment Concerning. Total disclosed: ₹7,670 Cr (8.6% of net worth). Fiscal year FY24-25.
- Service tax on interest subsidy FY2010-2017; demand ₹644.65 Cr + penalty ₹198.95 Cr + interest ₹1,077.62 Cr (first order) and ₹217.22 Cr + penalty ₹21.72 Cr + interest ₹262.76 Cr (second order); appea
- GST demand on interest collected upfront FY2017-2024; GST ₹341.29 Cr + penalty ₹341.29 Cr + interest ₹192.21 Cr; appeal in process before Commissioner (Appeals) Pune; new item vs nil prior year
- Service tax on additional reversal of Cenvat credit on investment activity FY2014-2017; demand ₹188.37 Cr + penalty ₹188.37 Cr + interest ₹253.58 Cr; appealed at CESTAT Mumbai; ₹630.32 Cr vs ₹602.06 C
Corporate governance
Board of 11 directors, 64% independent. Chair: Sanjiv Bajaj. Chair and CEO roles are separated. Statutory auditor: Price Waterhouse LLP and Kirtane and Pandit LLP. Board remuneration: 0.3% of net profit. Fiscal year FY24-25.
“Investment in subsidiaries (2,200.00) (200.00)”
What retail misses·The sharp 258% year-on-year surge in loans to related parties—from ₹155 crore to ₹555.28 crore—sits buried in the RPT disclosures but is never highlighted in earnings announcements or news coverage; similarly, the disconnect between positive reported profits and negative operating cash flow is a forensic red flag that balance-sheet readers miss.
Strengths noted in disclosures: Auditors issued an unqualified opinion with no high or material flags—only a minor note on ₹784.41 crore in loans overdue 90+ days, which is routine for an NBFC. · Contingent liabilities total ₹7,669.84 crore but represent only 8.6% of net worth, and consist mostly of legacy tax and litigation disputes with no single item exceeding ₹141 crore. · Subsidiary investments and warrant conversions by the holding company are transparently disclosed and represent normal group restructuring (₹2,200 crore capital infusion into Bajaj Housing Finance, ₹1,188.85 crore warrant conversion).
Forensic signal
From the company's own filingsStrong: 52-Week · Size · Weak: Yield