P. E. Analytics Ltd
Preview the depth — unlock the full forensic study.
You're reading the free Overview. The full Landscape study, the Lenses, governance and quality scans unlock with Pro — across 5,000 Indian companies.
Briefing
P. E. Analytics Ltd — the brief
Forensic posture: Routine flags. PropEquity's filings reveal 3 material related-party transactions—a ₹1 Cr loan to a troubled subsidiary, direct rent payments to the 67% promoter, and IT/consultancy fees to promoter-linked entities—but contingent liabilities are negligible (₹11 lakhs, near-zero % of net worth) and the auditor's remarks are absent from the input.
Related-party transactions
Assessment Notable. Disclosed volume of ₹2 Cr across 14 related parties. Fiscal year FY24-25.
- Loan to subsidiary amid alleged embezzlement: The company extended ₹10,000 thousands (₹1 Cr) in loans to its subsidiary Propedge Valuations Private Limited while simultaneously filing legal proceedings against the subsidiary's former director for alleged financial mismanagement and emb
- Rent paid to promoter Managing Director: The company paid rent and electricity expenses of ₹660 thousands (₹0.07 Cr) to Samir Jasuja (Managing Director and 67.12% promoter shareholder), which represents a direct payment to the dominant promoter and warrants monitoring for arm's-le
- Rent paid to KMP-influenced entity Topaz IT Services: Rent and electricity expenses of ₹3,480 thousands (₹0.35 Cr) were paid to Topaz IT Services Pvt Ltd, an enterprise significantly influenced by key management personnel, warranting scrutiny of commercial terms.
Contingent liabilities
Assessment Routine. Total disclosed: ₹0 Cr (0.0% of net worth). Fiscal year FY24-25.
Corporate governance
Board of 6 directors, 33% independent. Statutory auditor: Singhi Chugh & Kumar. Board remuneration: 12.7% of net profit. Fiscal year FY24-25.
“Rent & Electricity Expenses Samir Jasuja - - 660 660”
What retail misses·The related-party transactions flagged here—the subsidiary loan amid embezzlement, direct rent to the promoter, and payments to promoter-adjacent entities—sit in the RPT annexure and rarely surface in equity-research summaries or social media discussions, yet they reveal governance friction and concentrated decision-making around a 67% shareholder.
Strengths noted in disclosures: Contingent liabilities are trivial: ₹11 lakhs in TDS demands represents 0.001% of ₹89.6 Cr net worth—immaterial even if disputed.
Forensic signal
From the company's own filingsStrong: Momentum · 52-Week · Valuation · Weak: Yield · Size